I’m a pretty flexible person who’s open to trying new
things. I eat meat but I consider my diet to be balanced because I also eat fish, rice, fruits, vegetables, nuts, and other starches. After reading an excerpt from an essay by Gary
Steiner titled “Animal, Vegetable, Miserable”, I’m quite offended by his
writing in this piece. I respect vegetarians and vegans lifestyles because I’m
a very welcoming person and believe people should have the power to make their own
choices about what they put in their bodies without judgement. I’m annoyed with the perspective
of Mr. Steiner and any other strict vegans who think they are morally superior
to people who eat meat or use animal products. This is the world we live in, to
be quite honest we would have to regress as a society to prevent the use of
animals in any of commercialized products. Animals can be credited with having
specific qualities that are only found in nature that cure diseases and further
medicine. There are awful things that humans do to animals and I understand
that and I agree with Steiner in this regard as far as pertaining to collecting
and processing animals into food for human consumption. Yes, I think is
horrendous what domesticated animals have to endure before they become food for
human consumption, and there should be policies put in place to ameliorate such
terrible conditions. But I disagree with Steiner’s perspective on boycotting
any materials using animal products. Animals have been used for clothing, medicine,
food, and companionship for as long as humankind has inhabited this planet and
shouldn’t be stopped solely because of ethics or morality. I believe that
animals are being harmed during animal testing for these products and for food
consumption. I think for the balance of this world we live in; humans, animals
and the environment should coexist at a sustainable level. What I mean by
that is animals and humans live off the land, humans also live off the animals
and then once we die we become part of the earth again in a symbiotic
relationship. So all three aspects of the relationship are interchangeable
because humans would hinder our potential by only utilizing one food source but
in reality there should be a blend of different things as we treat animals, and
our environment properly so the earth is sustainable which at the moment isn’t
happening. Gary Steiner’s perspective is an extreme one and I personally think
his opinion is in the minority for a reason but he did discuss ideas that I
could also agree with to an extent.
Tuesday, October 13, 2015
Thursday, October 8, 2015
"Service Learning Reflection 2"
I was able to go to the Lord’s Acre farm on Wednesday
and volunteer with fellow classmates. The first thing we did was break apart
whole garlic bulbs and put the cloves into buckets so they could be used to help
with farming techniques. After that we went into the gardens and pulled out
weeds, so they wouldn’t interfere with the growth of the plants. Once that was
done we picked sweet potatoes from out of the ground. It was really fun to get
into the red clay dirt and pull out these massive sweet potatoes. It’s amazing
the yield of the crops that come out of the ground. It gave me a perspective of
how valuable every morsel of food can be for healthy sustenance. I thoroughly
enjoyed my time at Lord’s Acre because it was a different experience from what
I’m used to. I have very little experience with planting, gardening, or farming
so this experience was pretty cool to get dirty and feel the earth between my
fingers. I definitely appreciate good farming techniques to yield the freshest
and most natural vegetables which support a healthy lifestyle as well. This
trip gave me the idea of doing a little gardening myself and learning as best I
can about ways to raise vegetables that I like to eat. I also watched as my
other classmates picked Okra and then cut down the stalk after there was none
left. I really love fried Okra and to see how it’s cultivated was cool to me. I
have a newfound respect for the long hard hours that farmers and gardeners put
into planting and harvesting food. I think this service trip helped me learn
skills that can broaden my awareness of how food is collected before I see it
in a store or market. Overall, engaging with other people and volunteering at
the Lord’s Acre was a positive experience for me and I enjoyed doing it.
Monday, October 5, 2015
Methods to Fighting Obesity
Obesity is an epidemic in the United States and is causing
lots of money to be used for medical purposes to ameliorate diseases caused by
it. After reading the article “Downsizing Supersize” by James Surowiecki, his
display of an alternative outlook on how human choice is influenced by perceived
options. The 2012 New York City bill to ban the selling of 32oz soft drinks is
an example of former Mayor Bloomberg
trying to influence New Yorkers by “[offering] a choice in which one option is
seen as default, [and] most people go for that default option” (123). This is a
subtle way of battling obesity by influencing people’s thought process when
they’re buying soft drinks. It would be more expensive to buy two 16oz drinks if
the 32oz option was taken away and people would be indirectly conditioned to
not want to drink as much soda. The rhetoric used by Surowiecki to emphasize
his point is logos driven because his argument makes sense and he has reasoning
behind the idea of this ban on soft drinks could be a step in the right
direction towards combating obesity in New York City. The other text that I
read was a piece by Dhruv Khullar titled “Why Shame Won’t Stop Obesity” and how
the contemporary thought process to fight obesity is by shaming people into
losing weight. In this piece he discusses how this mindset is ineffective due
to the fact that “Americans today are exposed to an unprecedented amount of
readily available high-fat, high-calorie, and low-nutrient foods” (127). I
liked an idea that Khullar had about reversing this current trend by “[providing]
monetary incentives to promote the production of and access to fresh, healthy
food”, it would allow citizens to make healthier choices and be a real solution
to the problem. Khullar’s argument was Pathos driven because he strategically
addressed emotional aspects of obesity and shame in his piece. But he also used
it in a positive way to inspire the millennial generation to want to make
changes to status quo society.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)